About us
We got tired of writing the same action item.
We ran retrospectives, wrote down what we would fix, and then watched the same three problems survive every action list and every new tool. The meeting was never the problem. What happened after it was.

Why this exists
Nobody owns the after, and nobody owns the across.
Retros.ai started with a frustration most teams will recognise. We ran retrospectives, we wrote down what we would fix, and then we ran the next project and the same three problems came back. The retro from last time was archived somewhere. The actions had no owner. Nobody remembered that deployment pain had come up four retros in a row, because nothing was keeping count.
The tools did not help. They were built for the meeting: sticky notes, timers, a dot-voting round and a PDF export at the end. The hour was well facilitated. The months in between were not.
So we built the part that was missing. Retros.ai keeps a persistent record of every retrospective a team runs, carries open actions forward until someone closes them and tells you when a problem is recurring rather than new. Every retro opens with what you said you would fix last time and whether you did. That is the whole idea: retrospectives that remember, so your team does not have to.
We built it first for consultancies and agencies, where teams re-form for every engagement and the lessons from one project rarely make it to the next. It works just as well for product and engineering teams running sprint retros and incident reviews. The formats are familiar. The memory is what is new.
For a consultancy the problem is worse. Each client project is its own team with its own retros, so a problem that has burned five engagements looks, from inside any one of them, like it happened once.
We built the product around a single sentence a delivery lead should be able to say to a partner: this has come up on 5 of our 7 engagements, we tried to fix it twice, and here are the cards.
What we believe
Five things we will not move on
Evidence, not opinion.
A theme is shown only when it can cite specific cards in specific retros. A model's opinion about whether your fix worked is not a feature.
Honest input needs anonymity.
A junior consultant describing what went wrong on a partner's engagement tells the truth only if they are not named. Anonymity is a per-retro mode, resolved on the server.
Nobody pays per head.
A retro someone is left out of to save a seat is a worse retro. No band charges per Member, Guests never count against a cap on any rung, and the free rung holds 8 Members.
Your record is yours.
Downgrade or leave and nothing is deleted. You lose the analysis, not the record, and the record stays exportable.
Say what it does not do.
It is not a whiteboard, it does not generate templates and call that intelligence, and it does not show a free account a blurred picture of analysis it has not had.

Who we are
A small team that has run the retros it is describing.
We are a small team and we keep the product narrow on purpose. We would rather do one thing well than add another icebreaker library.
Get in touch